Mountain cabin by the lake

At the beginning of the current school year one of the professors in the Business division at Southwestern Adventist University announced they would be retiring at the end of the school year. Our search process began by identifying what our "ideal" candidate will look like - the degree(s) they have completed, the skills they posses, the experience they have gained, their relationship to the Adventist church, and the classes they are capable of teaching. Over the past several months we have received many applications for the position but none of them have met our ideal qualifications. I have learned over my 12 years teaching in higher education that this phenomenon is not uncommon - most job posting for professor positions have an "ideal" candidate description and a "will consider" candidate description. The ideal is what your "perfect" candidate will look like and the "will consider" is what you will settle for.

 
In decision theory (a subset of data analytics) this is the distinction between the optimal and satisficing outcomes - what is the best you can hope for vs. what will you be satisfied with. Satisficing solutions do NOT attempt to maximize objectives, instead they seek to exceed MINIMUM standards. This process is accomplished by establishing constraints that either must be met or can not be exceeded. Solutions are then evaluated based upon living within the boundaries of those constraints. Most models for decision theory do not solve for optimal, they only solve for satisficing. In our situation many of the candidates did not meet the constraints for minimum qualifications but several did leading us to interview those qualifying candidates and attempt to identify the best satisficing solution.
 
Interestingly most job seekers do not seek optimal employment but instead seek satisficing jobs (we see this documented in the roughly 80% of employees who are dissatisfied or unsatisfied with their work.) While they may WANT an optimal job they often settle for something far less. They feel stuck and unable to change their circumstances. Henry David Thoreau summed it up nicely in Civil Disobedience and other Essays when he said "the mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation." We spend our time trying to "find" happiness rather than simply being happy.
 
For many years when our children were young we spent our vacations rushing from one place to another where the destination was the ultimate goal. Regularly we would drive over 800 miles in a day (one time it was over 1,000.) In 2005 we flipped the script and planned a vacation to Southern California (our son wanted to go to Legoland in Carlsbad, California). On that trip we intentionally limited daily driving to under 300 miles and only exceeded that on two occasions - once leaving Yellowstone National Park and the other the last day of our trip driving from Colorado Springs, Colorado to Bismarck, North Dakota. We stopped a Mt. Rushmore, Devils Tower, Yellowstone, Grand Tetons, Great Salt Lake, Kings Canyon/Sequoia, Sacramento Zoo, Legoland, Sea World, San Diego Zoo/Wild Animal Park, Grand Canyon, Painted Desert, 4 Corners National Monument, Mesa Verde, and Pikes Peak (Lisa and the kids also went to Whit's End at Focus on the Family in Colorado Springs while I was in meetings!) For that trip it was all about the journey and not the destination.
 
I have often wondered if my relationship with God is focused too much on the destination and not enough on the journey. Instead of seeking for an optimal experience I settle for satisficing. In John 10:10 Jesus tells us that He came so that we might "have life, and have it more abundantly," In John 5:24 Jesus also states that if we hear His voice and believe Him we have "passed out of death and into life." This is present tense not future, God wants us to experience abundant life now not just sometime in the future! He wants us to experience the optimal life not just a satisficing one!
 
***Lisa and I often see pictures like this one and say "I could live there!" This photo is AI generated and not one I took, although it does depict part of what an optimal life might look like for me.***

Fresh Articles

  • A Different Perspective

    A number of years ago as I was attempting to understand God's methodology and His timing I came to the realization that from my perspective God is always a day late and a dollar short, but from His perspective He is right on time with just enough. My challenge is to stop seeing it from my perspective and start seeing it from His! These past few weeks as Lisa and I have been preparing for and implementing our move from Texas to Tennessee it has been essential for us to NOT view this move from our perspective but from God's.

  • Bask in the Presence of God
    50 years ago this evening I was impatiently waiting for the new day to arrive. I had spent several weeks visiting my grandparents in Loma Linda, California and on July 4 we were going to Disneyland! It wasn't actually my grandparents who were taking me (although they went along) it was my uncle Ken and Aunt Ruthie and it was a reward for helping Aunt Ruthie with her daycare (it was called baby sitting back then!) while she took her children, Heidi Ranalla and Adam Turk to swimming lessons. I still don't know what possessed us to think that it was a good idea but on July 4, 1976 we went to Disneyland!
  • Now Would be a Good Time

    In the movie Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home Chekov and Uhura have beamed into the reactor room on the aircraft carrier Enterprise to harvest radiation from the nuclear reactors. Due to failing power on the Klingon starship Scotty must beam them back one at a time. At 1:14:27 into the movie as the guards on the Enterprise are closing in Chekov makes an effort to contact Scotty to be beamed out of the reactor room making a desperate plea "Scotty, now would be a good time!" How often when things aren't going the way we think they should do we ask God to resolve the issue in the way that we think would be best. Like Chekov we declare "Now would be a good time!" for God to solve our problems.

  • At Your Age You Shouldn't Do That

    "For someone your age you really should stop doing ..." Not the words you want to hear from anyone but those were precisely the words the Emergency Room doctor used to begin the conversation with me last Sunday evening. To set the full context for the conversation I had been working on replacing some rotted out fascia boards on my house that included the "bird box" on the gable end. Since this house is built on a pier and beam foundation with a 3 foot crawl space the roof line is about 10 feet off the ground. I had set up an adjustable step ladder and was standing on the second from the top wrung piecing the bird box together. The ground was a little bit uneven and the piece I was replacing was about 5 feet long so it required stretching a little bit to reach the ends if I didn't want to reposition the ladder. As I was stretching to the uphill side the ladder decided it no longer wanted to stand upright and deposited me on my back on the ground below. In my mind my ego was far more damaged than my body but my wife and daughter insisted I get medically checked out.

  • Who Am I?

    Last week on Thursday and Friday two candidates for President of Southwestern Adventist University were on campus and met with faculty and staff. Both candidates were asked to describe their plan for engaging faculty and staff with the vision and mission of the university. One of them, Nelu Nedelea, presented a very interesting concept - "I like to ask three questions, Who am I?, What is the context?, and What is my role." He went on to explain that generally the core of who we are doesn't change, we may grow and expand our sphere but our core beliefs and values do not change. The context and our role influence how we apply who we are to any given situation, but in the end who we are ultimately determines how we act.

  • Irreplaceable?

    This morning I had several people stop by the Innovation Studio to inquire about completing various projects. Most had become aware that with the school year wrapping up I would be working on tying up loose ends in preparation for our move to Tennessee. A couple of them commented to me "what is the University going to do when you are not here to run this place and do these projects?" Since I have been very intimately involved in the development and implementation of the Innovation Studio over the past three years that question, in one form or another, has been lingering in the back of my mind. I have a passion for this place and the possibility of it closing weighed heavily on my mind when I made the decision to move back to the Collegedale, Tennessee area a few weeks ago.